🔗 Share this article

The tobacco company stands accused of “total contradiction” for campaigning against anti-smoking regulations in Africa that currently exist in the UK.

Campaign in Zambia

Correspondence acquired by reporters originating from the corporation's branch in Zambia to the nation's political leaders demands proposals to prohibit tobacco advertising and sponsorship to be canceled or deferred.

The company is attempting changes to a draft bill that include reductions in the recommended coverage of graphic health warnings on cigarette packaging, the withdrawal of controls on flavoured tobacco products, and watered-down penalties for any companies violating the new laws.

Health advocate reaction

“If I was a politician, I would say that they enable the defense of the British people and sustain the fatalities of the Zambian people,” said the anti-tobacco campaigner.

More than 7,000 Zambians a year pass away from smoking-associated diseases, according to World Health Organization estimates.

The campaigner stated the letter was known to have been circulated to several government departments and was in distribution within community advocacy networks.

Worldwide lobbying patterns

This occurs during expanded apprehension about industry interference with health policies. Recently, international health experts sounded an alarm that the tobacco industry was intensifying efforts to undermine international regulations.

“We see evidence of corporate influence worldwide. Tobacco company fingerprints are on postponed duty hikes in Indonesia, delayed regulations in Zambia and even a compromised resolution at the UN international gathering,” commented the corporate monitoring director.

Potential consequences

“Should anti-smoking legislation doesn't get enacted because of this letter, the consequences may be suffered in lives of people who might potentially stop smoking.”

The anti-smoking legislation going through Zambia’s parliament includes regulations surpassing UK legislation by also applying to e-cigarettes, and stipulating that visual health alerts cover three-quarters of product packaging.

Company alternative suggestions

Through correspondence, BAT suggests this be decreased to less than half “according to global suggested parameters”, deferred for no less than one year after the bill passes.

Global health authorities specifically advises a caution must occupy at least half of the product container front “and seek to occupy as much of the principal display areas as possible”. Within Britain, warnings need to encompass sixty-five percent of a packet’s front and back.

Flavored tobacco discussion

The corporation requests the elimination of comprehensive limitations on scented smoking items, arguing that it would drive users to “illegally traded” products. The corporation recommends prohibiting a smaller list of “tastes inspired by desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Each flavored smoking item have been prohibited in Britain since 2020.

The proposed legislation recommends punishments for multiple violations “extending from a portion of yearly revenue to a decade in prison”.

Company justification

In the letter, the managing director of the African subsidiary states the firm is “committed to responsible corporate conduct” and “supports the objectives of governments to reduce smoking incidence and the connected wellbeing effects” but asserts that “some regulations can have undesirable and unforeseen outcomes.”

Critic response

The campaigner argued BAT’s proposed changes would “weaken this legislation so much that the necessary effect for it to produce permanent improvement in society will not be achieved”.

The circumstance that multiple comparable regulations operated within the UK, where the corporation is based, was “complete contradiction”, he commented.

“We reside in a global village. If I plant tobacco in my back yard and harvest that and market the products – and my offspring don't use tobacco, but my community's youth consumes … to enrich myself and all the future family lines while my neighbour’s children are perishing … is in itself total emotional bankruptcy.”

Tobacco control legislation in the UK or elsewhere had failed to shutter businesses, Chimbala said. “Legislation never shuts down the industry. It only protects the people.”

Formal company response

A BAT Zambia spokesperson said: “The company operates its business in compliance with relevant national regulations. Further, the company participates in the state's regulatory development in line with the suitable systems which provide for relevant group engagement in regulation development.”

The firm positioned itself as “not opposed to regulation”, they said, adding that minors should be shielded from obtaining cigarettes and nicotine.

“We advocate for progressive regulation to achieve intended public health goals, while acknowledging the spectrum of rights and obligations on corporations, customers and associated groups,” the representative explained, adding that the corporation's recommendations “reflect the realities of the African nation's economy and cigarette sector, which involves increasing amounts of illicit trade”.

The nation's ministry of trade, commerce and industry was solicited for statement.